The West Indies doing better than expected
No doubt many West Indian fans - myself included - have been pleasantly surprised by their progress in the current World Cup, but perhaps unlike my fellow fans, I am not so convinced that it has been entirely of their own doing; situations and other
Colin Croft
26-Feb-2003
No doubt many West Indian fans - myself included - have been
pleasantly surprised by their progress in the current World Cup,
but perhaps unlike my fellow fans, I am not so convinced that it
has been entirely of their own doing; situations and other teams
are helping them out to no small extent.
© Reuters |
Even before the World Cup, I thought it would be difficult for
them to get into the Super Six, but the West Indies are now
comfortably placed, with a very important game against Sri Lanka
coming up next. Before they tackle that, though, they would do
well to look back and see what they did right - for a change -
and where they are still suffering.
After the unexpected - but tremendously invigorating - win
against South Africa, in the first game of the tournament that
seems ages ago now, the West Indies should have been in an
extremely buoyant frame of mind psychologically. But they
proceeded to stumble against New Zealand, and if that second game
did not tell their supporters what this West Indian cricket team
is made of, little else can.
Simply put, the West Indies should have beaten New Zealand too,
even with the by-now-famous Brian Lara run-out. New Zealand's
captain Stephen Fleming may have suggested that the run-out cost
the West Indies the game, but I beg to differ. To quote the West
Indies captain, Carl Hooper: No man (meaning Lara) is an island
- or a team, for that matter. I agree completely with that
sentiment.
When Lara was dismissed courtesy the relay throw, the West Indies
were 36 for two in the 10th over, chasing 242 to win. Even so,
the middle order - including Hooper himself - caved. Even in
spite of Ramnaresh Sarwan's big effort of 75 and Ridley Jacobs'
50 towards the end, the West Indian opening combination and muchvaunted middle order - outside the above-mentioned pair - managed
only 57 runs from five batsmen.
Of these batting "failures" during the game against New Zealand,
Hooper's dismissal, and not Lara's mindless third-run effort, was
the worst. Not for the first time, Hooper was deliberately set up
and trapped like a young school cricketer, allowed to hook and
pull when the stroke was completely unnecessary. Not for the
first time, therefore, Hooper failed to delivery when the chips
were down. The time to perform is not when things are going well
but when the situation is tough. What is necessary now for the
West Indies is to regroup psychologically, toughen up quickly,
and get ready for the big fray. They need to, immediately, for if
they cannot toughen up now, it may soon be too late.
Even before batting against New Zealand, the West Indies had made
numerous mistakes in the field. In the last 6.5 overs, New
Zealand moved from 188 for seven o 241 for seven, adding 53 runs
from 41 legal deliveries. Incredibly, Chris Gayle, only a parttime off-spinner, bowled at the death, his final two overs - one
of them being the last of the innings! - going for as many as 28.
For me, then, Hooper lost the West Indies that particular game,
due to his tactics and his inability to score runs when they were
needed. If I had been Vasbert Drakes, Merv Dillon or even the
then-on-song Wavell Hinds, I would have, on the field of play
itself, asked Hooper if he had gone mad. He had to have been
temporarily mentally challenged to allow Gayle to bowl at the end
of the innings.
© Reuters |
The rains put paid to the West Indies' efforts against
Bangladesh, although I am of the opinion that they should have
made at least 300 instead of their measly 244 for nine.
Bangladesh's attack is such that any Test team should be able to
notch up 300 against them.
The real shock, though, lay in their game against Canada. Again,
the West Indies may have come out on top, but this was the same
that managed less than 40 against Sri Lanka. Somehow, though,
they managed 202 against the West Indies. As the saying goes,
"These things only happen to the West Indies."
How can the West Indians explain Canada, who had totalled just 36
in their previous game, getting that many runs? It could, in
fact, have been worse, since at one stage Canada were 155 for
one. Had the Canadians been as talented and experienced as the
Kenyans, with a launchpad of 155 for one in the 21st over, the
eventual total would have been at least 260 - a daunting task
under any circumstances. One can imagine my chagrin when I
watched John Davison - who made that majestic 111 in only 76
deliveries including six sixes and eight fours, totalling 68 runs
in boundaries - actually advancing down the pitch to the number
one fast bowler of the West Indies, Dillon, and hitting him for
six? Believe me, it brought tears of confusion, misunderstanding
and despair to my eyes.
So now the West Indies are comfortable, having almost qualified
for the Super Six, but after the shock loss that Kenya handed Sri
Lanka in their last game - and remember! Kenya also shocked the
West Indies in 1996, when I came closest to having a heart attack
as at any other time in my life - do not be surprised by anything
anymore.
From a West Indian point of view, especially having played for
the West Indies, I am happy at their progress in the World Cup,
but considerable help has been garnered from Kenya, who beat the
Sri Lankans. Now the West Indies have to start helping
themselves, against Sri Lanka and then Kenya, or New Zealand
could just scuttle their boat.