Zimabwe Cricket Online editorial - the India tour, dissent, and more
So Zimbabwe's one-day series in India ended with one victory and four defeats
John Ward
17-Dec-2000
So Zimbabwe's one-day series in India ended with one victory and
four defeats. Without wanting to sound pessimistic, this was
perhaps the best result we might reasonably have expected, given
the strength of the Indian batting and their significant home
advantage. It would have taken either a superb Zimbabwe
performance or a poor Indian one to earn us anything better than
that.
FROM THE JAWS OF DEFEAT
Our one victory came in the third match when our middleand
lower-order batsmen fought their way back from the verge of
defeat. The great Sachin Tendulkar was virtually a one-man show
in the Indian first innings. Then, chasing 283, we were 52 for
three before - who else? - Andy and Grant Flower produced a
fighting partnership of 158 before three quick wickets fell. We
needed 70 runs off the last nine overs with only four wickets
left, still pretty unlikely. Heath Streak hit boldly, but the
real pleasure was in seeing 19-year-old Mluleki ('Syke') Nkala
come to grips with international cricket after a difficult
introduction and hit a superb 36. He also seemed to find some
better bowling form in that match. Finally Henry Olonga scored
the winning run as last man with just one ball to spare, which
will probably be the achievement he will remember best in this
series.
HENRY'S PROBLEMS
Henry, our most destructive bowler when on song, had nothing to
sing about in that department. He has remodelled his action due
to problems he had following through on the pitch, and has lost
his leap and his pace. He was never quick enough to trouble the
Indian batsmen and he was predictably omitted from the final
match. I'm surprised Carl Rackemann, a superb bowling coach, has
not found a satisfactory solution yet; surely he will do so
before long.
Another factor that undoubtedly played its part in Zimbabwe's
victory was their superior fielding. Throughout the series the
Indian fielding has been mediocre overall, with a few honourable
exceptions. The traditional Indian outfield is rough and
sparsely grassed, which do not encourage fielders to throw
themselves all over the place, although this is no excuse for
inaccurate throwing. But the outfields are becoming greener and
India will soon be catching up, no doubt.
OPENING THE BATTING
In this match Zimbabwe changed their opening pair yet again,
staring with Alistair Campbell and Guy Whittall. They did not
succeed in running each other out in making 28 together, as might
so easily have happened, but the team selectors perhaps decided
not to tempt fate any longer, and made yet another change for the
fourth match. Whittall was shuttled down to number six again,
and Trevor Madondo given his first international game of the
tour, opening with Campbell. This is the eighth time Zimbabwe
have changed their opening pair in 12 one-day internationals this
season.
Their partnership of 60 together was the only bright spot of the
match for Zimbabwe, and they did well enough to earn themselves a
rare second chance in the final match. Their 32 apiece were the
highest individual scores of an otherwise dismal match for the
team, the poorest showing of the series. Once again Zimbabwe
displayed their talent for inconsistency, a superb match
performance being followed immediately by a very poor one.
THE TRAGEDY OF GANGULY
This fourth match was dominated by the Indian captain Saurav
Ganguly, for both the right and the wrong reasons. His batting,
bowling and captaincy were outstanding. He even outshone
Tendulkar with the bat, he took five wickets with superb
medium-paced bowling and he was on the ball throughout with
bowling and fielding changes.
Before the match, however, match referee Barry Jarman, former
Australian wicket-keeper, had spoken to both teams about the
practice of over-appealing and pressurizing the umpires.
Ganguly, perhaps overexcited with his own success, appealed too
often and too forcefully, and behaved petulantly when his appeals
were rejected.
Mr Jarman was forced to act decisively after his pre-match
warning, otherwise the whole ICC system of match referees would
have been brought into contempt. He suspended Ganguly for the
final match, a courageous act as he had already required a police
escort to protect him from violence. This was probably why the
announcement of Ganguly's suspension was delayed.
I was both saddened and relieved by the news. It is sad that a
great cricketer, especially after such a magnificent all-round
performance, should have sullied his name with such misbehaviour,
which is in clear contravention of the spirit of the game (2000
Code, Preamble, paragraphs 1, 4, 5 and 7) and the laws (Law 42.1
and 42.18). I was relieved to hear that we had a match referee
with the courage to take a firm stand on the matter, rather than
simply hand out meaningless fines and suspended sentences.
I would have felt just the same way were a Zimbabwean player
involved, but no doubt this will not stop me from receiving the
mail from certain supporters who refuse to accept
that their own team or players can ever do anything wrong. The
Zimbabweans generally handled the situation well. I feel Guy
Whittall was justified in protesting to the umpires about
Ganguly's behaviour, as they did not appear to have the nerve to
confront the Indian captain on the field themselves. On the
other hand, I feel it may have been funny for Bryan Strang to
mimic Ganguly's tantrum when he had an appeal rejected, but he
should have dropped the matter there. Further confrontation was
not acceptable and merely aggravated the problem.
There have already been protests from some home supporters. They
say Ganguly was merely playing the game aggressively. If so,
when where must aggression stop, if not with the laws of the game
as clearly set down? They say that other players, and they name
Australians specifically, have behaved worse on the cricket
field, especially 'sledging', and got away with it - and this is
unfortunately true. The Zimbabweans generally do not have much
of a problem with the Australians, who are at least friendly off
the field.
The South African and New Zealand teams have also gained
reputations for 'sledging' in recent years. Those who knew the
New Zealand teams up until about ten years ago will find this
change surprising, as they used to enjoy the reputation of being
the most pleasant and sporting team on the international circuit.
This seems to have changed when Martin Crowe took over as
captain, after the retirement of Sir Richard Hadlee and several
other leading players who had made New Zealand second only to
West Indies at one time.
The Indians generally are among Zimbabwe's most pleasant
opponents and one hopes their captain will not change that. As
far as I am aware, Sachin Tendulkar has always set a fine example
on the field of play and never stooped to unsporting behaviour or
violating the spirit of the game, despite the adulation of a
thousand million people. He is a wholly admirable role model and
may the Indians seek to follow his example. As one Indian
correspondent rightly wrote to me, cricket is no longer a
gentleman's game. I am glad we can see the likes of Barry Jarman
and Sachin Tendulkar striving to stem the tide.
IT WAS AVOIDABLE
Probably the Ganguly incident would never had happened had Duncan
Fletcher's idea of allowing a side three opportunities in an
innings to 'appeal to a higher court' via technology been in
operation. He, or any other bowler in a similar position, could,
if he really thought he had a genuine case, refer the matter to
the third umpire. A batsman thinking himself wrongly dismissed
would have similar right of appeal. The limit of three per side
during the course of an innings would avoid numerous lengthy
hold-ups and also prevent teams from using them as a tactical
weapon.
A BLESSING IN DISGUISE
The loss of Ganguly actually worked to India's benefit in the
final one-day international, as it put an extra load of
responsibility on to their middle-order batsmen, who responded
magnificently. Hemang Badani stabilized the innings after early
Zimbabwean breakthroughs, and then an astounding partnership
between Reetinder Sodhi and Ajit Agarkar against some of
Zimbabwe's unfortunately familiar inaccurate bowling took the
total past 300. At least the Zimbabwean batsmen put up a good
show and for a while the team was competitive, but it lacked the
one really major innings necessary to make a real challenge.
Trevor Madondo came close to that, though. A wild and
undisciplined lifestyle has hindered his career in the past, but
hopefully that is permanently behind him. He is not used to
opening, but he began with some fine aggressive strokes and
reached a fine fifty off only 40 balls. Unfortunately the strain
and perhaps the heat then began to affect him, but his 71 was a
fine performance and perhaps a turning point. For years Zimbabwe
has been looking for a black batsman of real talent to go
alongside their bowlers, and it would do cricket here a power of
good if Madondo is now able to take the place his talent
deserves. The future is in his hands.
THIS ISSUE
There were several notable performances in club cricket last
weekend and we have interviewed two of the most successful
players, Neil Ferreira and David Mutendera, for this issue. We
have also caught up with Everton Matambanadzo who is in prime
all-round form for Universals. Next week, in our last issue of
the year, we hope to include interviews with Paul Strang,
especially with regard to his experiences in India, and Gus
Mackay, whose superb all-round form in club cricket last weekend
preceded his selection, for the first time at the age of 33, for
the tour of New Zealand.