ICC has no powers to impose sanctions: Gray
Lahore, Nov 17: The ICC has admitted that it had no powers to impose sanctions against India for refusing to tour Pakistan this winter
18-Nov-2000
Lahore, Nov 17: The ICC has admitted that it had no powers to impose
sanctions against India for refusing to tour Pakistan this winter. The
president of the game's governing body, Malcolm Gray, told a crowded
press conference that the PCB cannot be compensated for the estimated
$15 million loss it is expected to incur following the cancellation of
the series.
"It's sad and a pity that politics interferes with sports. But it is a
matter between the two governments. The ICC cannot force the
governments to change their stand because they make their foreign
policies.
"We neither have the powers to compensate the PCB nor we can force the
Indians to do so. All the ICC could do was the request the Indian
government to realize the importance of the tour and international
commitments. We did it by conveying the message through Indian
representatives besides writing them personally," Gray, a former
Australian Cricket Board (ACB) boss said.
Gray was put up with a barrage of questions ranging from betting and
match-fixing to India's refusal to ICC's authority and powers. But
unfortunately, most of the answers ended with Gray saying the ICC had
no powers.
When asked if the ICC had no authority, then what was the purpose of
its existence and why did it dictate the boards, Gray, said: "We are
not dictating the boards?
"But frankly speaking we don't have a solution to India-Pakistan
problems."
Asked if the ICC would press other boards to withdraw their teams from
touring India, Gray said: "What has happened in the last couple of
days, we certainly have to consider that proposal. But we don't have
the powers to ask other teams to boycott India.
"I am not sure if the cricket boards would delegate those powers to
us.
"The ICC has to be a central body with powers to control the sport
effectively like other sports federations. Unfortunately, the boards
don't give their authorities so easily."
Gray said sanctions needed to be discussed and finalized since the ICC
was planning to impose a 10-year tour plan so that each team can play
the other. "Obviously, it puts us in an uncomfortable position. We
need to look at the effect of the threat of India pulling out (against
playing Pakistan in Pakistan) and whether we can adopt any sanctions."
"The sanctions can be financial or suspension of their membership. By
doing that we will be putting pressure on the governments to respect
international commitments."
Betting and match-fixing: Gray admitted that the cricket
administrators were slow to react to the problem in the initial
stages. He, however, said the officials were now getting their acts
together and were slowly getting there.
"Initially, we have to establish the history of the corruption and how
big and wide it is, who are the culprits. We have to deal with those
culprits vigorously and robustly."
Nevertheless, Gray admitted that the ICC cannot get to the absolute
bottom of corruption. He agreed that the ICC cannot control
corruption, betting and get rid of the bookmakers.
"What we have to do is to put places in practises that quarantine our
players and educate them not to fall to temptations."
Gray said the ICC had no powers in terms of criminality and that can
only be left to the jurisdiction of the individual governments. "All
we can do is to suspend the membership of the boards who refuse to
cooperate with ICC anti-corruption unit."
Gray said he didn't have the powers nor he wanted them to order
inquiry against the ICC chief executive David Richards for hiding the
involvement of two Australian players with bookmakers. "It's upto Sir
Paul Condon (anti-corruption unit chief) to make his own judgement
from the information that he put before him. But I would like to
stress here that Sir Paul can investigate anyone (players and
officials) on anything."
Gray said part of Sir Paul's job was to liaison with the boards on
corruption issues like he has done in the case of Mark Waugh with the
ACB after his name appeared in an Indian CBI report. The other part of
his job, he continued, was to liaison with the officials of the
governmental bodies with the countries. He revealed that Sir Paul's
two investigators were in South Africa talking with Edwin King
Commission and two were in India talking with the CBI.
"In India, the investigators are trying to establish what was behind
the report, how much and how far they have taken the investigations
back. They have reported back saying that not much investigative work
has been done on the foreign players.
"They will now start their investigations against those foreign
players."
ICC headquarter being shifted: Gray admitted that the proposal
of shifting the ICC headquarters from London was in the pipeline.
He said in Singapore, discussions were held on the next location.
"Holland, Monacco, Switzerland, Singapore and England are under
consideration."
He said the ICC was also considering the appointment of both the third
country umpires. He added that at the moment, the ICC was reviewing
the standard of umpiring.