Jarrod Kimber

Not always a bad thing to be a NSW reject

According to Malcolm Conn , Peter Forest is a New South Wales reject.

Jarrod Kimber
Jarrod Kimber
25-Feb-2013
According to Malcolm Conn, Peter Forest is a New South Wales reject.
And he is. Forrest couldn’t cut it at NSW. He had a great start, played for Australia A and was talked about as a potential future player for Australia before he slipped off the radar. Eventually he struggled to even hold a place with NSW.
At some states, a player with his obvious talent might have been given more time, but you don’t get long at NSW. You’re either the next big thing, comfortable being a well loved but underused back up, or you’re out.
Full post
Angelo Mathews does exist, then

I once wrote that Angelo Mathews did not really exist

Jarrod Kimber
Jarrod Kimber
25-Feb-2013
I once wrote that Angelo Mathews did not really exist. He just seemed a bit too awesome. And not like other Sri Lankan cricketers. Angelo wasn’t a graceful middle-order mestro, or a tubby fighter. Angelo wasn’t a top-order slogger, or even a tricky spinner. That’s what Sri Lankan cricket was; we’d got use to their best players fitting these stereotypes. And suddenly here was this broad-shouldered (© Tony Greig), seam-bowling allrounder who could win a game batting, bowling or fielding.
It was too weird for me to process, so I just pretended he didn’t exist.
I felt like this when he fell over wickets against India, bowled Sri Lanka into a World T20 final, took a catch that went viral on Youtube and smashed Australia around the G. Now, finally after all these years, I am willing to admit that Angelo Mathews does exist, and he exists well. Really well. Weller than most. Peter Weller, well.
Full post
The curious cases of Hogg and Bailey

Brad Hogg ’s comeback and George Bailey ’s rise don’t seem to have made people all that angry.

Jarrod Kimber
Jarrod Kimber
25-Feb-2013
Brad Hogg’s comeback and George Bailey’s rise don’t seem to have made people all that angry.
That’s odd, isn’t it?
Australia have picked an oldy and a dude to replace a dude with roughly the same record of the other dude who is slightly older. Where is the disdain, the outrage, the editorial’s sprouting anti-Victorian intent and how Australia are overlooking their future for some old dude the commentators all like?
Full post

Showing 101 - 110 of 119